![figleaf waste timer figleaf waste timer](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/31/6f/5c/316f5c18d53216e0dd0db8a64daf8161.jpg)
And the carbon in that came from the atmosphere and was concentrated naturally without a huge wall of fans over an extended period of time. A kilogram of wood turns into 1.9 kilograms of CO2. Want concentrated CO2? Burn some wood and work with the gases which are produced. And there were hundreds of coal plants and then hundreds more gas plants in the USA. That massive operation consumed the output of only 13 coal plants for a year. I did the math a couple of years ago for the largest single consumer of industrial CO2 in the USA, the enhanced oil recovery wells in the south. There isn’t a lot of use for CO2 at anywhere near the scale of the problem we are facing. And its numbers exclude massive follow-on costs, so the $100 per ton is just the start of the cost build up. It won’t run off otherwise unused renewable energy. There is zero net removal of CO2 from the atmosphere if air carbon capture is used for enhanced oil recovery.Īs a reminder of what the last article found, Carbon Engineering’s solution would require 2-kilometer long, 20-meter high walls of noisy fans to capture 4 orders of magnitude less carbon than would be useful. The final article will address the key person behind this technology and the expert opinions of third parties. This fourth article will look at the market for air carbon capture CO2 and assess why three fossil fuel majors might be interested. The third piece returned to the insurmountable problem of scale and deals with the sheer volume of air that must be moved and the scale of machinery they have designed for the purpose. The second piece stepped through Carbon Engineering’s actual solution in detail. The first piece summarized the technology and the challenges, and did a bottoms-up assessment to give context for what Carbon Engineering is actually doing.
#FIGLEAF WASTE TIMER SERIES#
This is part 4 of the 5 article series assessing the technology and the value of the investment. > timer3.addEventListener(TimerEvent.Carbon Engineering recently garnered $68 million in investment in its air-carbon capture technology from three fossil fuel majors. > gettimertxt.text=String((getTimer()- startTime)) > timer2.addEventListener(TimerEvent.TIMER,Func_time2) > timer1.addEventListener(TimerEvent.TIMER,Func_time1) > I have foure text box inside stage (i cant attach file because of > we need to work with loop or other thing the timer stop working even > the timers work slowly, I don’t know why is that and how can I > timer worl alone another work and have condition, when we get the > depending on other process in my project
![figleaf waste timer figleaf waste timer](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0112/6822/7134/products/AERY-AE0022_FigLeafBotanical_200mlDiffuser_2WS_HI-01_1024x1024.jpg)
> have timer that work correctly with out can't you do that in Timer1? Also timer2 seems pretty redundant -Ĭould you run a single timer that tests various conditions instead? My question is why do you need timer3 to test the "step" variable To true again before the loop has finished. What is probably happening is that your flag_loop variable is set This will slow down your system whilst the loop runs. If you then start a loop to trace 1000 times during a timer event, Your Timer delay is possibly too small to be reliable - in theĭocumentation it says that a timer delay lower than 20ms is not Is why other process have an affect on timer? If we have loop in our Suppose that i set flagloop=true out side of Func_time2, mi problem Showing timer counts we may be able to give you some better direction.
![figleaf waste timer figleaf waste timer](https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-UT-P2SrogqA/VBpKwoVC22I/AAAAAAAADJU/aTcejsv5x60/s1600/2014-07-21%2B19.00.29.jpg)
If we knew what you were trying to achieve other than It also seems your example is "theoretical" rather than a solution Timer3 currently means the testTimer theoretically gets called 2 timesįor more useful information about how timers work in flash, check out: You set flag_loop=true somewhere else, you maybe okay, but your logic in With your 1000 loop traces and your timer resolution will suffer. Because your timer resolution is 1ms - so you will hold up the AVM